Share of VoiceStart with your brand →

See what is included

Inspect the evidence before you subscribe.

Start with our published own-brand study, then explore the monthly report format below. No account required.

Real historical evidence · our own brand

What the original answers actually said.

On 10 October 2026, we collected 624 answers about AI visibility tools. Our product name is also a common marketing term, so this was a useful check of brand attribution.

Literal phrase matches
260 / 624 collected answers contained “share of voice”.
Attributed brand mentions
0 / 623 analyzed answers were attributed to our product by the saved automated analysis. One answer was unclassified.
Scope
ai answer visibility monitoring · marketing and PR teams · Global · English

This historical study used 624 answers and an older question panel. It demonstrates inspectable evidence, not the quality, cost or results of the new 64-answer monthly scan. Brand attribution was automated, not independently manually verified. We sell the service discussed.

Read the first archived answer · OpenAI API

First record in the published archive, selected by archive order. Model: openai/gpt-5-mini. Collected: 2026-10-10T11:51:49.568Z. Historical model claims are unverified; this is not current product advice.

Exact question

I'm comparing ai answer visibility monitoring for marketing and PR teams. My goal is “how visible is my brand on LLMs”; I'm looking worldwide. Which options would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Original answer, unchanged

Shortlist (worldwide) — focused on “How visible is my brand on LLMs” (monitoring mentions, citations/sources, model coverage, prompt-scale sampling, and remediation workflow)

1) Profound — enterprise AEO/LLM-visibility platform: broad multi‑model coverage, deep citation/source attribution and dashboards for attribution to revenue/traffic. Good for large brands needing governance and reporting. ([llmvlab.com](https://www.llmvlab.com/guides/llm-visibility-tools?utm_source=openai))

2) Meltwater — GenAI Lens / enterprise media + AI monitoring: treats LLMs as a media channel, useful when you want AI visibility alongside earned media/PR workflows and alerts. ([meltwater.com](https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/best-ai-search-monitoring-tools?utm_source=openai))

3) Evertune — large-scale prompt sampling and benchmarking: built for high-volume sampling across many engines (useful when you need statistical confidence and longitudinal measurement). Best for enterprise measurement programs. ([llm-visibility-tools.com](https://www.llm-visibility-tools.com/rankings/llm-visibility-tools/?utm_source=openai))

4) Peec AI (and similar focused GEO/AEO tools — Otterly, GaugeAI, Genrank) — mid‑market SaaS that run scheduled prompt panels across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, etc.; good balance of cost, daily monitoring, and actionable recommendations for marketing/SEO teams. Pick one whose engine coverage matches your priority markets. ([growthmanager.ai](https://growthmanager.ai/compare?utm_source=openai))

5) Semrush / Ahrefs (SEO suites with LLM modules) — if you prefer integrating LLM visibility into existing SEO/content workflows; less exotic model coverage but strong content remediation recommendations and workflow integration. Good when AI visibility is an extension of SEO. ([bigsentiment.com](https://bigsentiment.com/llm-brand-monitoring-tools.html?utm_source=openai))

6) Frase / BrandJet / smaller specialist tools — useful for teams that want practical on‑page fixes and citation recovery alongside monitoring; lower cost entry for proof-of-concept pilots. ([frase.io](https://www.frase.io/blog/llm-visibility-tools?utm_source=openai))

How to choose quickly
- Required model coverage (ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot?)  
- Sampling scale (daily vs. thousands/month) for confidence  
- Citation/source visibility (shows which pages drove the mention)  
- Workflow integration (PR, CMS, analytics) and SLA/pricing

If you want, tell me: prioritized models and budget range and I’ll narrow to 2–3 vendors and recommended prompt/panel sizes.

Monthly report format · synthetic demonstration

What your monthly report contains

The example below uses a fictional brand, synthetic answers and illustrative website observations. It demonstrates the 64-answer format, not live model results.

Observed in this sample

Who gets recommended?

Website links use direct source URLs returned with collected answers. These can be inline citations, grounding sources or provider source lists; a link alone does not establish an inline citation. Unverified redirect destinations are excluded from this metric. Source basis is shown with the supporting answers.

64 of 64 planned answers were collected; 64 were analyzed. All planned answers were collected and analyzed.

Brand appearances across analyzed answers
BrandNamedRecommended
Example Option64 / 6464 / 64
Example Brand (your brand)48 / 6432 / 64

An answer can name or recommend several brands. A mention alone is not a recommendation. Citation-only names are excluded from brand mentions. These counts describe the eight questions tested, not the entire market.

Coverage & interpretation

0 ambiguous brand references are excluded from identified brand counts.

Question fit: 62 on topic, 2 mixed, 0 off topic, 0 unclear, 0 not assessed. Off-topic answers stay in the evidence.

0 collected prompts differ from the saved question wording.

Buyer-need questions: brand named in 42 of 56 analyzed answers.

Category-only check: brand named in 6 of 8 analyzed answers.

Did the result repeat?

Across 32 complete question/provider pairs, your brand was recommended in both runs in 5, in just one run in 22, and in neither run in 5.

Each pair uses the same question, wording, model and collection settings. Missing answers, incomplete analysis and model-version changes are excluded. Two runs show observed variation, not a statistical confidence estimate.

Results by model provider

Example Brand: mention and recommendation counts use analyzed answers; website-link counts use collected answers
ProviderAnalyzed / collectedNamedRecommendedWebsite link / collected
OpenAI16 / 161283 / 16
Gemini16 / 161283 / 16
Claude16 / 161293 / 16
Perplexity16 / 161273 / 16

Sixteen answers are planned per provider. Different model versions and search systems can produce different results; this sample does not establish why.

Results by question scope

Coordinate client projects · your brand named in 24 / 32 analyzed answers
Track billable time · your brand named in 18 / 24 analyzed answers
Broad category discovery · your brand named in 6 / 8 analyzed answers

Sources returned with the answers

Providers return inline citations, grounding sources or source lists. A source list does not establish that the answer cited every page. Older answers may not record the source basis. None of these links independently verify the page’s claims.

example.net · returned with 26 answers

Source URL

Source basis not recorded: 26 answers.

https://example.net/agency-guide ↗
example.org · returned with 26 answers

Source URL

Source basis not recorded: 26 answers.

https://example.org/comparison ↗
example.com · returned with 12 answers

Source URL

Source basis not recorded: 12 answers.

https://example.com/features ↗

Website evidence

Your website’s GEO check

GEO means visibility in generative search. This check records crawl instructions, readable HTML and page metadata; it does not assign an AI ranking score.

Checked 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC · 1 page fetched · Checked within this scope

Example Brand — project managementhttps://example.com/ ↗
Fetch & redirects
HTTP 200
HTTP indexing header
No X-Robots-Tag header returned.
Structured identity declarations

Organization: Example Brand · https://example.com/

Search crawler rules
No disallow rule matched this path for OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot or Googlebot.
Indexing meta tags
No noindex directive observed in robots / Googlebot meta tags.
Page title
Example Brand — project management
Meta description
Illustrative page description for the sample report.
Main headings (H1)
Coordinate your client projects
Canonical declaration
https://example.com/
Structured data types
Organization, SoftwareApplication
Text in fetched HTML
1,640 characters after scripts, styles, navigation and hidden elements were removed. This is a content observation, not a quality score.
This is synthetic website evidence used to demonstrate the report layout. No website was fetched for this example.

Scope: homepage and up to two relevant linked pages; robots.txt first. No JavaScript rendering, authenticated pages, live index checks or proof of crawler visits. JSON-LD types are detected, not validated for search eligibility. An accessible page is not guaranteed to be indexed, cited or recommended.

Methodology references: Google Search AI features · OpenAI search crawlers

The supporting answers

Choose a question/provider cell or filter the evidence. Original responses are preserved below each extracted quotation.

Recommendations for Example Brand by question and provider. Each cell shows recommended / analyzed answers out of two planned runs.
QuestionOpenAIGeminiClaudePerplexity
Q1 · Coordinate client projects: Product shortlist
Q2 · Track billable time: Product shortlist
Q3 · Coordinate client projects: Cost and plan limits
Q4 · Track billable time: Capabilities and reliability
Q5 · Coordinate client projects: Usability and support
Q6 · Track billable time: Setup and integration
Q7 · Coordinate client projects: Capabilities and reliability
Q8 · Category discovery without a specific audience or buying need
64 matching answers.
OpenAI · run 1 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example ChatGPT · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗
OpenAI · run 2 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example ChatGPT · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.
Example Brand · recommended
Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗
Gemini · run 1 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example Gemini · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.
Example Brand · recommended
Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗
Gemini · run 2 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example Gemini · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Brand also appears in this category, although this response does not recommend it for coordinate client projects.
Example Brand · incidental
Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Brand also appears in this category, although this response does not recommend it for coordinate client projects.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗
Claude · run 1 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example Claude · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.
Example Brand · recommended
Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗
Claude · run 2 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example Claude · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.
Example Brand · recommended
Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Brand is a suitable choice for coordinate client projects, especially when the team wants project and time records together.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗
Perplexity · run 1 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example Perplexity · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Brand also appears in this category, although this response does not recommend it for coordinate client projects.
Example Brand · incidental
Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Brand also appears in this category, although this response does not recommend it for coordinate client projects.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗
Perplexity · run 2 · Q1 · Analyzed

Exact question
I'm comparing project management software for small creative agencies. My goal is “Coordinate client projects”; I'm based in the United Kingdom. Which products would you shortlist, and why? If you cannot establish suitable options or evidence for a comparison, say so. Stay within the requested category.

Synthetic example Perplexity · 19/10/2026, 12:00:00 UTC

Question fit: On topic

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.
Example Option · recommended
Full original response
Synthetic example — no model was queried.

Example Option is a recommended alternative for coordinate client projects; its simpler workflow may suit a smaller team.

Compare the buyer's workflow, reporting needs and available budget before selecting an option. These fictional descriptions illustrate different response patterns.

Returned source links · Source basis not recorded. A returned link does not verify the page’s claims. Provider titles do not verify redirect destinations.

Illustrative source ↗

Model statements may be inaccurate. They record the response, not independently verified claims about a business.

How to read this snapshot

Eight unbranded buyer questions × four model APIs × two independent runs. The same questions are reused monthly until you edit your brand profile. Results describe these API responses at collection time; consumer chat apps, personalized sessions and other questions can differ.

Two runs reveal some variation but cannot estimate a stable market share. Changes between months can reflect model updates, source availability, randomness or profile edits. The website check is separate evidence and does not establish a cause for the answer results.

Prepare your monthly scan →